CHARLES PUTNAM

   Nursing Homes Affiliated with CHARLES PUTNAM

Table below shows each skilled nursing home that CHARLES PUTNAM is associated with, the nursing home's overall 5-star quality rating and provides a link to a comparison on the home to its local competition.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid uses nine categories to indicate how owners and managers are affiliated with skilled nursing facilities: 5% Or Greater Direct Ownership Interest, 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest, 5% Or Greater Mortgage Interest, 5% Or Greater Security Interest, Director, Managing Employee, Officer, Operational/managerial Control, and Partnership Interest. These categories are shown in the table below.

NursingHomeDatabase offers data exports as Excel spreadsheets or APIs for companies or individuals that need ownership information for more than one facility. Prices vary; use the Data Request page to inquire.

Skilled Nursing Facility	Description
Wingfield Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Cente Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 120 SPARKS, NV Ranking: #10 out of 10 (Ranking List)

Skilled nursing homes with the red icon () are homes where CMS had indicated that abuse has actually occurred or is likely to have occurred.

   Other Skilled Nursing Facilities Previously Associated with CHARLES PUTNAM

Table below shows each skilled nursing home that CHARLES PUTNAM was previously associated with, the nursing home's overall 5-star quality rating and provides a link to a comparison on the home to its local competition.

Skilled Nursing Facility	Description
Alpine Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Most Recent Record: 09/01/2022 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 189 RENO, NV Ranking: #8 out of 14 (Ranking List)
Port Lavaca Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Most Recent Record: 05/01/2014 Role: 5% or more ownership interest	No. of Beds: 148 PORT LAVACA, TX Ranking: #2 out of 7 (Ranking List)
Solidago Health and Rehabilitation Most Recent Record: 06/01/2017 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 129 TEXAS CITY, TX Ranking: #31 out of 38 (Ranking List)
Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Segui Most Recent Record: 03/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 122 SEGUIN, TX Ranking: #20 out of 26 (Ranking List)
Val Verde Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Most Recent Record: 01/01/2015 Role: 5% or more ownership interest	No. of Beds: 76 DEL RIO, TX Ranking: #3 out of 3 (Ranking List)
Windsor Mission Oaks Most Recent Record: 02/01/2015 Role: 5% or more ownership interest	No. of Beds: 150 SAN ANTONIO, TX Ranking: #47 out of 76 (Ranking List)
Cascades at Senior Rehab Most Recent Record: 01/01/2015 Role: 5% or more ownership interest	No. of Beds: 199 PORT ARTHUR, TX Ranking: #17 out of 19 (Ranking List)
Harlingen Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Most Recent Record: 08/01/2016 Role: partnership interest	No. of Beds: 120 HARLINGEN, TX Ranking: #5 out of 19 (Ranking List)
Ebony Lake Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Most Recent Record: 05/01/2016 Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 122 BROWNSVILLE, TX Ranking: #4 out of 14 (Ranking List)
Reunion Plaza Healthcare and Rehabilitation Most Recent Record: 06/01/2022 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 99 TYLER, TX Ranking: #1 out of 25 (Ranking List)
AZALEA PLACE HEALTHCARE & REHABILITATION Most Recent Record: 07/01/2016 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 99 TYLER, TX
Twilight Home Most Recent Record: 05/01/2014 Role: director/officer	No. of Beds: 102 CORSICANA, TX Ranking: #5 out of 17 (Ranking List)
Mira Vista Court Most Recent Record: 08/01/2014 Role: 5% or more ownership interest	No. of Beds: 142 FORT WORTH, TX Ranking: #71 out of 92 (Ranking List)
Legacy at Jacksonville Most Recent Record: 09/01/2017 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 101 JACKSONVILLE, TX Ranking: #3 out of 22 (Ranking List)
Windsor Atrium Most Recent Record: 06/01/2016 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 120 HARLINGEN, TX Ranking: #16 out of 19 (Ranking List)
The Waterton Healthcare and Rehabilitation Most Recent Record: 05/01/2022 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 92 TYLER, TX Ranking: #10 out of 27 (Ranking List)
Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Corpu Most Recent Record: 02/01/2015 Role: 5% or more ownership interest	No. of Beds: 120 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX Ranking: #4 out of 18 (Ranking List)
SILVERADO HERMANN PARK Most Recent Record: 04/01/2017 Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 80 HOUSTON, TX

Skilled nursing homes with the red icon () are homes where CMS had indicated that abuse has actually occurred or is likely to have occurred.

  About the NursingHomeDatabase Skilled Nursing Owners Database

Our database of information about owners, managers, and directors of skilled nursing homes is based primarily on data provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ("CMS"). CMS updates this information eleven times a year, typically at the end of each calendar month except for December. We pull the data as soon as it is available, run through a series of data checks and calculations and make the new data available right away.

The ownership data is typically just over 155,000 records covering over 45,000 individuals and companies that either own or are managing skilled nursing homes. The number of nursing homes in the NursingHomeDatabase skilled nursing home database is just over 15,000 which suggests that most homes will have more than one owner or operator and that many individuals and companies are involved with more than one nursing home. There are nine unique roles that are reported on:

• 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
• 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
• 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST
• 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST
• DIRECTOR
• MANAGING EMPLOYEE
• OFFICER
• OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
• PARTNERSHIP INTEREST

The data is based upon records submitted to CMS by the individual nursing homes. There is often a lag time between the reporting of a change and its appearance in our database.